The other kind of Birther, the Vattle Birthers, believe that even if Obama was born in the United States of America, he is a illegal president because it take two American parents or maybe just one, or something like that because of stuff like Vattle. (I don’t spell Vattel right on purpose because it just seems so stupid to me.) Anyway, Vattle is a 300 year old French person from France so who cares what he thinks about anything!!! Plus, I have suggested the Vattle Birthers sue Obama in Lousiana which has French laws, and see if they can win there. Which I doubt.
Then we have the British Vattle Birthers who think Obama is British because his father was British, but that seems stupid, too, because the Queen of England ain’t the Boss of Me!!! The British are very nice people, and our friends now, but they can’t tell us nothing about nothing who our citizens can be. American laws do!!I have a youtube video to “prove” that which is really short and funny, too. (No alligators were harmed in the making of that video! (LOL!!!)).
So first, here is some stuff from law cases that I got from somebody named Black Lion who won’t say Hi! back to me, and is a very RUDE OBOT!, but his stuff is right. Every time I try to read the Vattle BLAH BLAH BLAH stuff, the Vattle Birthers are just getting beat the heck out of by the STUPID OBOTS, but that is the Vattle Birther’s fault for trying to make some sort of stupid point that doesn’t even make sense. Like the British stuff which is REALLY STUPID. So here is Black Lion’s stuff, and then my Anti-British Law video.
So after reading this, PLEEEEAAAASEE Vattle Birthers, STFU!!! and come help the rest of us Birthers in a fight we can’t lose. Plus, if you are NOT a Birther yet, and think we are all just crazy to be suspicious, you might want to read my first INTERNET ARTICLE here, A U.S. President Wouldn’t Lie, Would He??? which is here on this website in April and will really, really help you be suspicious of U.S Presidents. But here is the Law Case and a link so you can read the WHOLE THING.
“It thus clearly appears that by the law of England for the last three centuries, beginning before the settlement of this country, and continuing to the present day, aliens, while residing in the dominions possessed by the crown of England, were within the allegiance, the obedience, the faith or loyalty, the protection, the power, and the jurisdiction of the English sovereign; and therefore every child born in England of alien parents was a natural-born subject, unless the child of an ambassador or other diplomatic agent of a foreign state, or of an alien enemy in hostile occupation of the place where the child was born.”
“The same rule was in force in all the English colonies upon this continent down to the time of the Declaration of Independence, and in the United States afterwards, and continued to prevail under the constitution as originally established.”
“All persons born in the allegiance of the king are natural-born subjects, and all persons born in the allegiance of the United States are natural-born citizens. Birth and allegiance go together. Such is the rule of the common law, and it is the common law of this country, as well as of England. We find no warrant for the opinion that this great principle of the common law has ever been changed in the United States. It has always obtained here with the same vigor, and subject only to the same exceptions, since as before the Revolution.”
“Based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born Citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents. Just as a person “born within the British dominions [was] a natural-born British subject” at the time of the framing of the U.S. Constitution, so too were those “born in the allegiance of the United States are natural-born citizens.”
“The Plaintiffs do not mention the above United States Supreme Court authority in their complaint or brief; they primarily rely instead on an eighteenth century treatise and quotations of Members of Congress made during the nineteenth century. To the extent that these authorities conflict with the United States Supreme Court’s interpretation of what it means to be a natural born citizen, we believe that the Plaintiffs‟ arguments fall under the category of “conclusory, non-factual assertions or legal conclusions” that we need not accept as true when reviewing the grant of a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.”
The Whole Law Case
Then here is my Anti-British law video I got off youtube, which “proves” (DUH!!!)the British ain’t the Bosses of Us, anymore:
PS: Since I wrote this, Black Lion said Hi! back to me, and said he wasn’t sure I was the same SQUEEKY, since STUPID OBOTS are always pretending to be me JUST TO GET ON MY LAST NERVE!!!! So Black Lion isn’t a rude OBOT after all. My mistake.